Only a Stone Age or a barbaric people write without facts. And idolise hearsays at the expense of people’s pain.
For how on earth are you able to base your reason on something without facts?
How are you able to say that “I exist.” Without you first being able to see or feel yourself in a way of “I think therefore I am.”
So in seeing or feeling my existence, I base my reason and express my judgement.
Now look what a sham of writing that we see from the Guardian, to CPS, to Sky News etc.
A media and a Crown Prosecution that have no regard or love or any passion for truth and facts.
A media and a crown prosecution that in writing without mentioning any evidential fact, they show to ignore the HUMANIST cry for truth. And consider people as sheep who cannot wait to see someone punished with or without facts.
A media and a U.K Crown Prosecution that are thirsty for punishment even if the judgement of the judges of the courts are totally wrong and abusive.
Say that the UK Media, the Crown Prosecution and judges in courts are above the law themselves. Or perhaps they find a people that complies with their abuse of power. And so carry on.
Let us get some facts.
Well, you as media and as Crown Prosecution say that, “Claudia Webbe threatened to use acid against her victim.”
But what did she exactly say? Neither the Guardian, nor Sky News nor the UK Crown Prosecution say what exactly was said in those recorded phone calls that they deemed “THREATENING.”
Fooling us, grown people, and using us like clowns.
So, the only fact that I read was the BBC that said; “The court was told on one occasion she made an “angry” call, used a derogatory term and added: “You should be acid.”
Evening Standard, on the other hand, elaborates a little bit further and says: “She then started calling me a slag and saying friends don’t send pictures of their tits and pussy to other friends, and it culminated in, ‘You’re a slag and you should be acid.” (words as expressed by Evening Standard, – MP Claudia Webbe ‘engaged in campaign of harassment against woman. – https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/claudia-webbe-labour-suspended-harassment-trial-b957470.html’)
These Fact, which they mention, I do not see as threatening at all. For you should be acid means different things but not a threat.
You should be acid can mean, you should be acid because of your way of hurting my feelings.
Like for example, if I hear you hurt me with your offensive words, I can say: “You should be poison.”
But that doesn’t mean that I am poisoning you.
Furthermore, the word “SLAG” is well within the words of free speech,.
What are we trying to be with this form of total intolerance? A fascist small-minded Britain that cannot even tolerate someone express a feeling without threatening his or her freedom?
Britain is a country of generosity not of small0-minded Nazis like these corrupt today institutions are trying to metamorphose Britain,.
Without further ado, Let us read exactly how an abusive U.K media and an abusive Crown Prosecution writes;
The Guardian wrote:
“Webbe was found guilty of harassing Michelle Merritt, a friend of her partner, with threatening phone calls. A trial was told she had called Merritt a slag, threatened to “use acid” and said she would distribute naked pictures of Merritt to her family.” The Guardian, MP Claudia Webbe given suspended sentence for harassing woman.
“In March 2019 Webbe spoke to her victim, threatened to use acid against her, and threatened that naked photographs and videos of the victim would be shared. There is no suggestion the images were real.” (Claudia Webbe MP guilty of harassment – https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/claudia-webbe-mp-guilty-harassment)
Sky News wrote in its heading: Claudia Webbe: Labour calls for MP to resign after she avoids jail for threatening partner’s female friend with acid. (04 11 2021 – By Alix Culbertson, political reporter, and Ali Fortescue, news correspondent)
In short, with Media not mentioning the sources of full facts of the recorded phone calls of Claudia Webbe. And with facts as they stand, facts said by the BBC and Evening Standard, we see that the judgment passed at Westminster Magistrate Court is rushed and intolerant.
And the fact that neither the British Media nor the Crown Prosecution press do not QUESTION the judgement of the British CORRUPT JUDGES . I see but a STONE AGE INSANITY in regards to Claudia Webbe. And a danger to the ideals of tolerance and truth. A dangerous thought to the future of humanity. A Danger to Free Speech and to the SANITY of British and European people created by British Media first by a thuggish Crown Prosecution that totally and wholly disregards fact and truth.