The British Nationality and Borders Act 2021 is equal to the Nazi Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. Dr ACactivism explains
In this critic of the Nationality and Borders Act 2021, as the writers of this law want it to be called, I intend to focus my critical thought on the essential content of this law. A law, where we will see through facts and reason how evil that it is. A law that does abuse human dignity through an abusive and oppressive thinking. A law that metamorphoses Great Britain into a New Nazi Britain. And that furthermore, it tries to confuse the reader through a very bad structure of writing. Instead of being clear and obvious in their ideas.
So, let us begin expressing and analysing the content of the Nationality and Borders Act 2021.
Power to the Secretary of State and to Courts to be above the Law.
The Nationality and Borders Act 2021’s essential thinking does not only abuse human rights but also it gives super powers to courts, to authorities and to the Secretary of State. And it makes these powers above the law. That is, this LAW allows people of authority to be above the law itself. Instead of writing a crystal clear law where people of authority can obey to the ideas of the law in itself.
For example, at page 56, the writers of this law give super powers to the Secretary of State to change the current laws of immigration. And do whatever he desires with the immigration laws. So putting the Secretary of State above and beyond the law itself by saying:
“The Secretary of State may by regulations make such amendments and modifications of the Acts relating to immigration as in the Secretary of State’s opinion facilitate, or are otherwise desirable in connection with, the
consolidation of the whole or a substantial part of the Acts relating to immigration.”
So we read it above clearly that the Secretary of State may by regulations make amendments and modifications of the Acts relating to immigration.
So it is the Secretary of State that can make the rules in relation to a person’s entitlement to enter, reside or remain in the United Kingdom, or to a person’s removal from the United Kingdom. So the Secretary of State is put in a position that is above and beyond the law itself.
This way of thinking, that I just expressed, is very crucial. For a society that has fair laws should not allow people of authority to be above the law. But it should make laws fairly in a way that people of authority are the servants of the law.
However, the U.K and the entire western world has not yet comprehended this evil philosophy in the politics of law. For this philosophy is a subtle way that intends to allow people of authority to control Social Power unjustly. And thus enslave people and the world through the whims and desires of people of authority.
Further, we will see through facts in this piece of philosophical writing that during the entire bill, there is a keen writing to give powers to the Secretary of State and to courts. While leaving ambiguous lines undefined. So to give power to authority.
This law, however, achieves its climax of ridiculous thought at page 56. Putting it black ink into white paper. Power to the Secretary of State to change the laws themselves through regulations.
Based only on the above facts, then, I can say that this law is not only a sham of thinking and writing. But it further is a criminal thinking. And as unfair is this law as the thinking of MAFIA to rob and murder.
The conclusive logic of what I said above is further proved in writing on page 57, where the MAFIA-like writers of the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 write, “The provision that may be made by regulations under subsection (2) includes provision amending, repealing or revoking any enactment.”
And the subsection (2) says: “The Secretary of State may by regulations make such provision as the Secretary of State considers appropriate in consequence of this Act.”
That means that whatever that the Secretary of State deems appropriate can become a law. And this means that the law cannot dictate to the Secretary of State what is appropriate. Now you get the essence? So the Secretary of State can dictate to the laws of the time what they should allow to exist and what should be oppressed and imprisoned.
The essence here is that this law is not written with the intention to guide people of authority to think and act through a clear defined law. But rather this law is written with an “essential thought“ that intends to make people of authority gods. Gods that can wish and desire and abuse and oppress and control however they wish and like, the immigration laws. And with these laws and through these laws, they abuse the immigrants of this country called, U.K.
ILLOGICAL POWER TO COURTS
Now that we spoke about unbridled powers given to the Secretary of State, that seemed to have been put above the laws. Now let us speak about the authority of courts, that are also put above the law itself.
For example on page 53, the law says;
“(section 62) Tribunal charging power in respect of wasted resources
(1) After section 25 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 insert—
“25A First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal: charging power in respect of
wasted resources (1) If, in respect of proceedings before the First-tier Tribunal or Upper Tribunal,
the Tribunal considers that—
(a) a relevant participant has acted improperly, unreasonably or negligently, and
(b) as a result, the Tribunal’s resources have been wasted, it may charge the participant an amount under this section.
(2) Subsection (1) is subject to Tribunal Procedure Rules.
Section 63 on page 54 says that Tribunal Procedure Rules must prescribe conduct.
“(1) Tribunal Procedure Rules must prescribe conduct that, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, is to be treated as—
(a) improper, unreasonable or negligent...”
Here the law does not specify how much for what. Or what is improper, unreasonable or negligent.
But leaves the courts to decide. So courts here stand above the law. For they make a law within a law by having as such power.
And further, it achieves its climax by saying nothing in the tribunal rules may compel the Tribunal to think and act in a particular way. Putting the power of the authority of courts above the law just like the law did with the power and authority of the Secretary of State.
The same page of the law says;
“(3) Nothing in Tribunal Procedure Rules may compel the Tribunal to impose a
charge, or make an order, mentioned in subsection (1) in relation to conduct
(whether or not that conduct is prescribed under that subsection).”
Now to speak about another point of the law. And that is but open discrimination.
For the writers of this LAW openly discriminate between different forms of refugees.
For example, the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 at page 12lve part 2 of the law, section 1, speaks about what they call “Differential treatment of refugees.”
And it is in this section that the law discriminates openly between two forms of refugees. Supporting one form, that they call, Group 1. And prosecuting the other form for illegal entry, which is called, Group 2.
So the law says, for example, that to qualify under the group 1 means that: (a) they, refugees, have come to the United Kingdom directly from a country or territory where their life or freedom was threatened (in the sense of Article 1 of the Refugee Convention), and
(b) they have presented themselves without delay to the authorities. “
On page 33, the lawmakers further show this form of discrimination by noting:
“A refugee is not to be taken to have come to the United Kingdom directly from a country where their life or freedom was threatened if, in coming from that country, they stopped in another country outside the United Kingdom, unless they can show that they could not reasonably be expected to have sought protection under the Refugee Convention in that country.”
With above concepts, the law abuses both the rights of the people that come from a country or territory where their lives are threatened physically. For they demand too many things for them in order to be accepted. And they also abuse the rights of those people who are threatened economically or soulfully, like I want to call it.
Hence, this concept of the good cause that the law specifies here is not good enough and nor is it fair enough. For it discriminates between this and other good causes for entry in this country.
For example, there are other good human causes which are not considered by the Nationality and Border Act 2021.
Like for example: “What about the economic oppression that the U.K government and the western world creates by controlling the labour power of the third world countries? Where workers are paid with pennies for commodities that are usually sold for thousands of pounds in our western world?
A union of human rights, https://enduyghurforcedlabour.org/, has written that Apparel brands are complicit in Uyghur forced labour. “The supply chains of most major apparel brands and retailers are tainted by Uyghur forced labour,” it said. (link https://enduyghurforcedlabour.org/news/402-2/)
And as if this to not be enough, immigrants are exploited in the middle of Europe and even in London.
For example, immigrants from China, Pakistan and Bangladesh were made to work 14 hours a day for just over 3 euros an hour. According to Reuters.
“Italian police” said Reuters, “have arrested a Chinese couple accused of running a leather goods business which exploited immigrant workers it employed to make handbags for a Burberry supplier (BRBY.L), according to an arrest warrant seen by Reuters.” (Italian police probe subcontractor to Burberry over labour exploitation -warrant - June 9, 2021)
This thing is common in many restaurants of London as well. Where I have seen firsthand people being exploited, underpaid and kept like slaves in some restaurants in Kingsbury, London. Working 12lve hours shifts for £3 per hour.
Now in the case of Burberry. Even though our laws do not blame Burberry because of the subcontractor loopholes and abuses, still they are guilty as hell to a simple logic. And Burberry need to be prosecuted.
Furthermore, in Rana Plaza collapse, which killed 1,138 people and injured many more people, on 24th April 2013, investigators found clothing labels from Western retailers, like Canada, USA, U.K, Spain, etc., in the ruins of the building.
Thing which is another fact that shows what our western world is doing to the rest of the world.
Clothing labels from Western retailers in the ruins of the building where over a thousand human lives have been lost from the abuse of power of these retailers.
So should this form of exploitation and abuse of social power, that we do to the rest of the world, matter in regards to how we consider the treatment of immigrants here or not? For that is the point of why I mentioned a few facts here.
I think that these facts should matter to a thinking humanity that demands to make FAIR LAWS and not discriminatory and abusive laws like the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor did. Or like the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 shows to be.
So, the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 then openly discriminates between people who face economical oppression because of the unjust control of world’s economic power by our western world and people who face a danger to their lives directly again as the consequence of western politics that create wars around the world. Like the war that the U.K and our western world has created in Syria, the continual abuse of Palestine, and the war in Afghanistan, in Yemen and so on.
Then based on this shallow and unfair concept of “good cause,” the law creates discrimination and discriminates in a manner in the same way as the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor did.
And this is how discrimination and the abuse of human rights become a law. For example, this law after telling us why it should discriminate. Then it says to us at page 13 paragraph 6, how the Secretary of state can discriminate between type 1 and type 2 of immigrants:
“(6) The Secretary of State or an immigration officer may also treat the family members of Group 1 and Group 2 refugees differently, for example in respect of—
- (a) whether to give the person leave to enter or remain;
- (b) the length of any period of limited leave to enter or remain which is
given to the person;
- (c) the requirements that the person must meet in order to be given indefinite leave to remain;
- (d) whether a condition under section 3(1)(c)(ii) of the Immigration Act 1971 (no recourse to public funds) is attached to any period of limited
leave to enter or remain that is given to the person.”
Further, based on the same wrong concept that a good and acceptable cause for entering the U.K is when coming from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened, the law continues to discriminate. And abuse human rights.
So at page 17, section 80B, called, Asylum Claims by persons with connection to safe third State, this law says:
(1) The Secretary of State may declare an asylum claim made by a person
(a “claimant”) who has a connection to a safe third State inadmissible.
And further the law gives the right to the Secretary of State to move these poor immigrants to third world countries. And do whatever with the laws of immigration.
For example, the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 says at paragraph 6 under the same section:
- “(6) The fact that an asylum claim has been declared inadmissible under subsection (1) by virtue of the claimant’s connection to a particular safe third State does not prevent the Secretary of State from removing the claimant to any other safe third State.”
Then, the entire philosophy of this illogical, abusive and criminal law seems to be in the fact that the law or the lawmakers of this law intend to move immigrants and asylum seekers to third world countries. And remove any responsibility out of the imperialist U.K. And the reason that I just expressed, that seems to be the crux of this abusive and criminal law, we will further see as I continue to unfold reasons and facts in this piece of philosophical writing.
Now as we continue to express facts and reason, let me say that a paragraph in the page 18 of the same law shows another fact that explains my reason that I just noted above in regards to the philosophy of this law. That is to move immigrants who enter the U.K into third world countries.
On paragraph 4 under Section, 80C, (Meaning of “connection” to a safe third State) the bill says:
“Condition 4 is that—
- (a) the claimant was previously present in, and eligible to make a
- relevant claim to, the safe third State,
- (b) it would have been reasonable to expect them (the claimants) to make such a claim, and
- (c) they failed to do so. “
So this again means that immigrants entering this country easy-peasy can be moved to third world countries despite the fact that they now are in England.
Further, at page 33, the law reinforces this prejudice and leaves loopholes or gaps in law for abuse of the refugees’ rights.
For example on page 33, Article 31(1): a section called, “immunity from penalties,” says:
“(1) A refugee is not to be taken to have come to the United Kingdom directly from
a country where their life or freedom was threatened if, in coming from that
country, they stopped in another country outside the United Kingdom, unless
they can show that they could not reasonably be expected to have sought protection under the Refugee Convention in that country.”
So here the law leaves room for abuse of the immigrants. For judges in courts can easily say, we expected you to have asked or sought, like the law says, for asylum in another country. Which you crossed while coming to the U.K. For that country was a safe country. So why didn’t you do that? Now let me send you to a third world country. Easy work, right? Thanks to the abuse of human rights put down in this law.
So, through this philosophy , the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 kills two birds with a stone.
For first of all, authorities can accuse poor and unprotected immigrants for failing to make a claim in third world countries. And secondly, they can also have plenty of room, as it was shown so far and as it would be further shown in this critical thought, to move these poor and unprotected immigrants to third state countries. And thus easy-peasy getting off the shoulders of the U.K government a heavy weight of human responsibility to care of these unprotected human beings in need of protection, humanity and dignity.
And thus after making possible through twisted reason, an illogical law, this evil thinking then, it makes “removals and priority removals and the abuse of the rights of different immigrants” as easy as it was the abuse of the Jews through the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor or the Nuremberg laws of September 1935.
Up to 5 years to Prison for immigrants entering the U.K!
Further, Part 3, page 35-36, of the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 stipulates the abuse of anything human by certifying the imprisonment of the immigrants up to 5 years for illegally entering the U.K! How dare they and do that? Of course the writers of this law called, the Nationality and Borders Act 2021, seem to have the same essential intentions as Nazis had with the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. Intentions that speak of discrimination, abuse of human rights and robbing people’s freedoms through a law that nullifies anything human.
IMMIGRATION OFFENCES AND ENFORCEMENT
“…(i) for an offence under subsection (A1), to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or a fine (or both);
(ii) for an offence under subsection (B1) or (C1), to imprisonment for a term not exceeding four years or a fine (or both).”
Furthermore, on page 37, paragraph 38 called, “Assisting unlawful immigration or asylum seeker,” is another fact that assaults and assassinates anything that is human.
For example, the law amends Immigration Act 1971 in the most inhumane way. And charges imprisonment for life for supporting unlawful immigration! Wow!
Life imprisonment for assisting immigrants to enter the U.K!
On page 37, the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 says; “In section 25(6)(a) of the Immigration Act 1971 (assisting unlawful immigration
to member State or the United Kingdom: penalties) for “imprisonment for a
term not exceeding 14 years” substitute “imprisonment for life”.
But I ask the writers of this NAZI law: “What is more unlawful as using third world labour for profit? Encaging people there for 12lve hours per day for 7 days a week to produce commodities and raw materials for western companies? Making business with countries that abuse basic human rights? Selling arms to countries that use them to murder innocent people? And even making wars possible for hyper capitalist profit? Political actions that essentially make and push humans to immigrate en masse.
Laws then must match reason and humanity. But here the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 is instead abusing reason and humanity in the most open and criminal way since 1936. When the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor did come to power.
So of course that the writers of the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 are trying to send the U.K into a stone age era. When barbarisms of thinking ruled over what is human.
For I ask: :From where do these thugs, sorry, these lawmakers get the right to charge someone with imprisonment for life for assisting another human being to exist as a human being in the planet where he or she was born?
Here even a child, if he is not taught to lie and murder and kill, but taught to love and care, he or she will be able to judge it rightly and fairly by saying that this LAW IS ABUSIVE TO BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS of existing in freedom and care through work and thinking.
So we see that the purpose of this law again and again is to make the law more oppressive, more abusive and more inhumane. And therefore equal in nature and thought to the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. That was passed by Hitler and Nazis.
“What else can be said in regards to the hypocrisy and evil made possible by the Nationality and Borders Act 2021.” You may ask.
Now, in regards to the victims of crime and modern slavery, first of all the law makes it difficult for the victims of the modern slavery to receive support. And then on page 46, it pretends to support what the law in the first place denies! And again this support or alms depend on the hand of the Secretary of State not on a law that is specific and well defined. A joke of all jokes, right?
Let us read the facts.
Thus on page 46, the law says: “Identified potential victims etc., in England and Wales: assistance and support
After section 50 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 insert—
“50A Identified potential victims etc: assistance and support
- (1) The Secretary of State must secure that any necessary assistance and support is available to an identified potential victim (within the meaning given by section 49 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2021
(the “2021 Act”)) during the recovery period. “
But who is a victim here when the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 has showed us so many facts so far that deny help to victims by preparing them to send into third world countries? And that discriminate against immigrants. Eh, who is left a victim here, when the law has killed all the rights of the victims so far?
The Nationality and Borders Act 2021 has killed all the rights of identifying one person as being the potential victim. Above they show that they intend to support victims of modern slavery. However, they show here more than an action of paying lip service to the support of the victims of modern slavery. For they have denied the rights of immigrants in the many facts and paragraphs of the Nationality and Borders Act 2021. Which I have mentioned earlier on.
Further, the same law, what it says on page 46, it denies on page 47. So we see again and again how open and ridiculous the hypocrisy of the writers of this law is.
So, the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 says on page 47:
“Leave is not necessary for the purpose mentioned in—
- (a) subsection (2)(a) if the Secretary of State considers that the person’s
need for assistance is capable of being met in a country or territory
within paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (4) (or both);
- (b) subsection (2)(b) if the Secretary of State considers that—
(i) the person is capable of seeking compensation from outside the
United Kingdom, and
(ii) it would be reasonable for the person to do so in the
A country or territory is within this subsection if—
- (a) it is a country of which the person is a national or citizen;
- (b) it is one to which the person may be removed in accordance with an
- agreement between that country or territory and the United Kingdom
- (as contemplated by Article 40(2) of the Trafficking Convention). “
So this bill is a joke and it contains an unfathomable amount of hypocrisy, stupidity and criminal thought.
For on page 46 we saw that this law say that it intends to support victims of slavery. So mentioning a human right in passing. And then denying on the next page what it just said.
For on page 47 this law says clearly that LEAVE to remain in this country is not necessary if the person’s need for assistance is capable of being met in another country. And that “another country” can be a country which the person may be removed in accordance with an agreement between that country or territory and the United Kingdom.”
So what the writers of the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 write is similar to the style of the Nazi writers of the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. That was passed by Hitler and Nazis.
So this law does not only abuse human rights but it also denies these rights that it also pretends to give in the most ridiculous way.
This law, in short, it has in mind two things, one to deny the right of asylum seekers to remain in the U.K. And secondly to move these asylum seekers to third state countries. Where the U.K gov has agreements with.
Further facts. For example, on page 28 the law goes so far as to revoke the right of appeal for immigrants. And it speaks of the right to remove immigrants to third world countries.
Paragraph 25 at page 28-29 says: “Claims certified as clearly unfounded: removal of right of appeal
The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 is amended in accordance with subsections (2) and (3).
In section 92 (place from which an appeal may be brought or continued)—
- (a) in each of subsections (2)(a) and (3)(a), for “94(1) or (7) (claim clearly unfounded or removal to a safe third country)” substitute “94(7) (removal to a safe country)”;
- (b) in each of subsections (6) and (8), for “94(1) or (7)” substitute “94(7)”.
While paragraph 3(A) on page 29 puts it clearly that there is no right of appeal. And it nullifies human rights. Giving powers to the Secretary of State to act on his whims.
“(3A) A person may not bring an appeal under section 82 against a decision if the claim to which the decision relates has been certified under subsection (1). ”in subsection (4), for “Those States” substitute “The States”;
for the heading substitute “Certification of human rights or protection claims as unfounded or removal to safe country”.
Here the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 section 82 gave power to immigrants to appeal a decision when the Secretary of State has decided to revoke a person’s protection status.
However, the Nationality and borders Act 2021 revokes this right.
From the above facts and changes in law, we further read and understand my point, that I made at the beginning and throughout this piece of philosophical thought. Where I wrote that the intention of this law is to send immigrants to third world countries. And abuse their human rights. That means that the above change in law is one more fact that tells us of the crystal-clear thinking of the murdering Nazis of the U.K Parliament. Who wrote this abusive and criminal bill.
Further; the law speaks of a judgment based on the balance of probabilities in relation to the victims of slavery or human trafficking on page 43. Yet it does not explain what this “balance of probabilities” means in itself. Leaving room for abuse as always.
So, philosophically speaking, what they do is like drowning someone in water and then pretend to save him or her!
This law then plays with people and people’s rights.
Furthermore, this law reaffirms my idea, that the purpose of this law is to send victims of slavery or human trafficking to third world countries. And not support them.
For example, page 47 after affirming the fact that they intend to support the victims of slavery,. They also note that “Leave is not necessary for the purpose mentioned in—
(a) subsection (2)(a) if the Secretary of State considers that the person’s need for assistance is capable of being met in a country or territory.”
That means U.K politics easily shrug and dust off their shoulders by throwing victims of slavery or human trafficking on third world countries. And saying that they can seek compensation there.
I am not putting the whole page here. But anyone can download the law and check the facts if they doubt my reason.
Further Schedule 3 of the law on page 60-61 called, REMOVAL OF ASYLUM SEEKER TO SAFE COUNTRY, one more time reconfirms my philosophy that said: The purpose of this law is to send asylum seekers to third state countries. So abusing their human rights and doing whatever that U.K politicians want to do.
In section 77 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (no removal while claim for asylum pending), after subsection (2) insert—
“(2A) This section does not prevent a person being removed to, or being required to leave to go to, a State falling within subsection (2B).”
And the section to 2B fulfils the dream of the criminal writers of this law:
“(2B) A State falls within this subsection if—
(a) it is a place where a person’s life and liberty are not threatened by reason of the person’s race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.” And as such countries are many third world countries.
So openly and clearly the above section means that the U.K authorities can move asylum seekers to third state countries by law.
Furthermore, the law goes so far as to attack goods vehicle’s drivers for not making sure that there are not illegal immigrants. Going to absurdity.
So page 65 says: “31A Penalty for failure to secure goods vehicle etc
- (1) The Secretary of State may impose a penalty on a person responsible
for a goods vehicle which has arrived at a place mentioned in subsection (2) if—
- (3) A penalty may be imposed under subsection (1) regardless of whether any person has obtained unauthorised access to the vehicle during its journey to the place mentioned in subsection (2). “
The law makes responsible the owner, hirer and operator of the trailer. So, on page 67 the law goes to another level of absurdity by saying; “the driver and P, the person who owns the goods vehicle, are jointly and severally liable for the penalty imposed on the driver (whether or not a penalty is also imposed on P).”
This is an absurdity of a different level. For the law demands the driver to secure the vehicle from the access of illegal immigration. But well, I secure it in the way I can and how much I can. Not you to order me what and how to do my job. As I am not a police officer but a lorry driver.
And as a driver my duty is to drive a vehicle not police the world, right?
So in short we see that the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 does not say, ej, you victims of human trafficking or immigrants are here now. So then let us support you. Or let us give your rights of working and staying here. Contrariwise, they have meticulously worked hard to make it difficult for the victims to seek support. And at the end, they to achieve to toss them like a piece of paper in the third world countries.
So this is a law then that has as an essential purpose to destroy human rights’ laws, cancel the rights to appeal, silence immigrants and abuse their basic rights. An abusive law really.
So now you see why the Nationality and Borders Act 2021 is equal to the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. Because it abuses human rights. Because it discriminates against a particular group of people – the most oppressed part of the humanity of a nation - Immigrants. Because this law abuses logic. It offends humanity. And intends to discriminate, oppress and imprison people unjustly. Just like the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor.